Commissioners Upset Over City Attitude

"As mentioned previously, the City of Sanford is not interested in controlling dispatch services for the Emergency Medical Services or rural fire departments."Hal Hagwar, Sanford City Manager

Letter to Lee County Commissioners, January 28, 2009



The Fayetteville Observer reported this morning that the Sanford "Refusal on 911 plan angers [Lee Board of Commisioners] members." That statement came in a letter (click here) from Sanford City Manager Hal Hagwar to commissioners 10 months after the city was sent a proposed written agreement for the operation of the county's 911 center. During that period, the county's request, started under the prior board, was largely ignored, and the city has never offered an alternative contract to the county's proposal. Also, during that period the city tried to get the county's PSA designation removed so it could operate completely independently.



The primary issues are money, control, and accountability. As one official put it, Sanford wants all the money and control but no accountability.



The letter was received as being belligerent, uncooperative, and disdainful of the needs of Lee County citizens not living within the city limits. This should come as no surprise. The 911 center operates under the exclusive control of Police Chief Ronnie Yarborough and is typical of his management style and the acquiescence to that style by what has too long been a majority of council members and the city manager. Yarborough has been chief for 36 years and established a reputation as an arrogant and vengeful manager, and few officials seem willing to take him on.



One exception has been Lee County Sheriff Tracy Carter. In a manner similar to the shared 911 operation, drug enforcement was in the handled in the county as well as the city by a Joint City-County Drug Task Force under Yarborough. Carter ran his campaign on disbanding the Task Force and the Sheriff's Office taking back direct responsibility for drug enforcement in rural areas felt neglected by Yarborough. The Sheriff's Office has proven much more successful in cracking down on drug dealers across the county than the former task force, including some busts in the city. Sheriff Carter has said, however, that he has no interest in operating the county 911 center and is hopeful that the city and county can come reach a workable and lasting agreement.



The statements made about rural fire departments and EMS dispatch were viewed as a threat by most of the commissioner's, except Commissioner Robert Reives who is part of Yarborough's network. Despite the impression reported in the Federal Observer, Commissioner Jamie Kelly was very muted in his response. Kelly is unlikely to take on Yarborough while Yarborough is protecting Police Detective Kevin Bryant during the State Board of Elections investigation of perjury in connection with signs Kelly acknowledges he had printed, and in which Bryant has been implicated by Steve Thomas.



Until the letter, there had been no interest whatsoever on the part of commissioners in terminating the arrangement with the city, only is establishing a vehicle for accountability and a means of resolving public concerns which have long been ignored by Yarborough. The letter's clear lack of interest of the citizens of the entire county and exclusive focus on its own citizens will undoubtedly anger rural county residents who may recognize that the narrow focus and arrogance of the city could leave them waiting for an EMS response to a heart attack or see their homes go up in flames.



The city may regret delaying the matter until the new commissioners were seated. The current board of county commissioners appears much more aggressive and supportive of the county manager. A number of citizens have approached commissioners about requiring that the city employ a new 911 center director who reports directly to the city manager rather than Yarborough. They argue that given that most calls are for Sanford police, he is likely to look at concerns and grievances of other users as coming from competitors, and note the impossibility of working with a city official known for his arrogant and intimidating style.Commissioners are likely to demand an oversight board made up of stakeholders to address performance standards and patterns of cooperation. The tone of the letter, they argue, simply reinforces the need for these measures.



These additional features are similar to a contract between Wake County and the City of Raleigh which current commissioners are studying closely. When the county initiated its 911 system, it created an emergency telephone system that is required by law to enable the user of a voice communications service connection to reach emergency help by dialing the digits 911 and provide enhanced 911 service. The local funds to pay for the system are collected by Lee County and the operating cost of the center is shared by the city and county on the basis of call volume. The first point of reception of a 911 call is called a public safety answering point (PSAP), and the state recognizes Lee County, not Sanford, as the single PSAP for Lee County. As such, the county agreed to a verbal contact with the City of Sanford approximately 20 years ago that the city would operate the actual call center.



At the center, a call for emergency assistance is processed up to the point that the call is ready for dispatch, including the use of equipment, call classification, location of a caller, and determination of the appropriate response level for emergency responders. The city directly dispatches calls from within the city to police and fire departments, EMS, and rural fire departments. Calls from county residents are transferred to the Sheriff's Office and Broadway Police department where they the actual dispatching is done.



According to the city, the cost of operation of the call center is approximately $940,000 a year and the county's portion is about $150,000 a year. This reflects that 83% of the call volume is generated by city residents.



The state of North Carolina 911 Board distributes money to the county to support local, enhanced 911 service. The money cannot be used for operation costs but is used for training, equipment, and similar items to support the continual upgrade of the 911 services. Since Lee County is the designated PSAP, the funds go to the county and are distributed to the city to support authorized expenses of the 911 center. On occasion, the county has elected to distribute some of the money to other agencies for training and equipment involved in the 911 system. (Note: The city rate is inflated to some degree because it has elected to use the call center for such purposes as reporting water outages and sewer problems, not what most people think of as traditional emergency 911 calls. Yes, your call with a genuine emergency could be delayed by an operator responding to someone with a leaking water pipe.)



For a number of years, rural fire departments have raised repeated and numerous complaints about the manner in which Chief Yarborough operated the call center but with no success. As noted earlier, Yarborough, after 36 years on the job and the center of the "good ol' boys network", recently refused to attend a meeting with the mayor and others (See post) to be briefed on newly discovered information related to the perjured election form filings. The chief is virtually inaccessible. A visit to the City of Sanford web site does not even disclose his name, he seldom, if ever, participates in activities like the Committee of 100, and it is well known uses the powers of his office to intimidate council members to concur with the level of independence with which he operates the police department.



Ronnie Yarborough's minions on the Sanford City Council balked when the county proposed that the 20 year old verbal agreement be put in writing, establishing standards of performance, procedures documenting the use of state 911 funds and other forms of accountability. According to Hegwer's letter to the commissioner's, "The agreement is simply asking the City to blindly hand over the keys to our communications center and all operations to Lee County." This reflects the Chief's position that he will not work under circumstances of accountability.



The city's real interest is having sole control of the state 911 funds. Due to the controversy, $173,768 in state 911 funds earmarked for Lee County have been held in Raleigh. The current fund balance on hand is $615,005. Two members each from the commission and the city council are expected to meet this week to see if common ground can be found on the issues.

Kevin Bryant Had Grievance With Herb Hincks

May Explain Bryant's Involvement With False Forms

It is the season of choose your successor. In recent weeks the clerks of court of Lee, Moore, and Chatham County have resigned from office, each with just about two years left in office. In their cases, the Chief Superior Judge will name a successor who will have the advantage of incumbency in the 2010 election. This is how the last two sheriff's initially came to office in neighboring Moore County. Naturally, usually the person resigning the position and the individual or group filing the vacancy have come to some agreement on who that successor shall be.With a little less than two years in Sheriff Billy Bryant's term, Kevin Bryant, then the Chief Deputy, persuaded Billy Bryant to take the same approach provided that he (Kevin Bryant could) get the necessary appointment from the county commissioners. Doing so would have allowed him to face the assumed challenger, Tracy Carter, as an incumbent. Instead he could only run as Chief Deputy who had to publicly admit he wasn't allowed to make any policy decisions in the sheriff's office, a comment considered by many a turning point in the race.

Pfizer Buys Wyeth in $68 Billion Consolidation Move

Combined pharmaceutical company to layoff more than 19,000 workers to scale back costs.

According to Market Watch  Pfizer Inc., the world's top drug maker, said Monday it will buy rival Wyeth for $68 billion in the biggest pharmaceutical merger in eight years.  Wyeth is Lee County's largest employer, and the impact in terms of loss of jobs is at this point unknown.  Even without the merger changes, the nature of the industry would likely put some employees at risk.

At the same time,  Pfizer Inc. reported a 90% plunge in fourth-quarter profit, stemming mostly from a large legal settlement. The company also announced a 10% reduction in its workforce and said it would cut its dividend payment in half in order to help pay for the Wyeth acquisition. The layoffs will be folded into a larger round undertaken by the combined company, which expects to shed more than 19,000 workers -- amounting to about 15% of its combined workforce.(Read More From Market Watch)

But Pfizer CEO Jeffrey Kindler, who took the top job in 2006, insists the Wyeth deal is different from its earlier mega-mergers with Warner-Lambert in 2000 and Pharmacia in 2003.

Kindler told a news conference that the Wyeth merger is not about "a single product or cost-cutting," as with past deals. Instead, "it's about creating a broad, diversified portfolio."

Nevertheless, cost-cutting there will be. Pfizer expects to achieve about $4 billion in "synergies" by 2012, enabling it to reduce the combined workforce of the two companies by 15%, or some 20,000 jobs. As part of those synergies, Pfizer announced Monday that it will eliminate 8,000 jobs, 10% of its workforce. It is also closing five of its 46 manufacturing plants.

Pfizer announced today that it plans to cut another 10 percent of its workforce, or 7,800 jobs. Analysts,pharma watcher Daniel Hoffman and Sanford C. Bernstein analyst, Timothy Anderson told the Philadelphia Inquirer that the job-shedding that will attend the merger will likely hit Wyeth harder than Pfizer. "Generally, in this kind of deal, you would be looking at 25 to 30 percent cost reduction," Hoffman told the paper, "but here it's going to be more like 50 percent." Timothy Anderson, however, predicts Pfizer would cut 70 percent of Wyeth's current $10 billion spending on R&D and marketing/administration.
 
In an article written in speculation of the merger, Business Week offered this analysis:

The general reaction: Acquiring Wyeth might boost Pfizer's fortunes in the short term, but it won't solve the long-term problems that are roiling the major pharmaceutical makers. As many observers have noted, Pfizer and the rest of the drug industry suffer from a lack of promising new products to replace older ones going off patent. What is less widely understood is that Pfizer also will face an increasingly constrained marketing environment, even if it succeeds in bulking up with Wyeth. 

Industry Analysis:  Biotechnology Firms Outpacing Big Pharmaceuticals Pfizer alone spent $8 billion last year which was greater than the sum spent by biotech’s top five companies. What this tells us is that pharmaceutical companies are grossly unproductive when it comes to drug discovery and development. This would explain why nearly three-quarters of all new medicines approved for sale in the US last year originated at biotechnology companies. 

It is becoming increasingly apparent that biotechnology companies are much more efficient at R&D than pharmaceutical companies. More importantly this suggests that something must change so that pharmaceuticals can continue to receive adequate ROI on internal discovery programs. Perhaps big pharmaceuticals ought to spend a greater portion of its R&D budget on biotech mergers and acquisitions rather than continuing to invest in inefficient and failing internal R&D programs.

While biotechnology companies are exceptional in drug discovery, they are severely lacking when it comes to clinical development of new drugs. This is largely due the high costs of conducting human clinical trials (which are required for regulatory approval of all new medicines). Most biotechnology companies are strapped for cash and don’t have sufficient funds to conduct clinical trials on their own.

Not surprisingly, given the recent financial downturn, there has been a recent spate of deals in which pharmaceuticals have been willing to pay large sums of money for clinical development rights to promising new biotechnology drugs. Moreover, a majority of the almost 160,000 employees layed off by pharmaceuticals companies in the past few years have been R&D scientists.  Unfortunately, this paradigm shift doesn’t bode well for doctoral students and post-doctoral fellows who are training in the life sciences. This is because many entry-level biotech positions, traditionally filled by newly-minted PhD's and postdoctoral fellows will likely be filled by experienced, pharmaceutical employees who lost their jobs in the recent rounds of layoffs.
Source: BioJob Blog

Editor's Note: Two Videos on the Pfizer-Wythe Merger have been added to the video page. In one two experts discuss the impact of the merger and in another Jeffrey Kindler, CEO of Pfizer, puts a brief spin on the merger. (click here)

Chief of Police, City Manager Refuse Mayor's Request

"Not Interested" in Elections Briefing


Police Chief Ronnie Yarborough lived up to his reputation last week when he and city manager Hal Hegwer refused a request to meet with the mayor and the editor of this blog so that information obtained in connection with the board of elections complaint could be shared with them. Actually they refused twice, once with Mayor Olive going through normal clerical circles and once when each was contacted directly by the mayor personally. 

The city manager, like others before him, appears to allow Yarborough, who in reality is just a city employee, to operate unchecked, free of supervision. The actions seem to confirm widely held views of Ronnie Yarborourgh's  running the Sanford Police Department free of supervision, a degree of secrecy and isolation.  While the mayor does not supervise the city manager or police chief, Cornelia Olive is the elected representative of all of the citizens of Sanford, disregarding such a personal request from the mayor shows his arrogance in his position.

The mayor had sought the meeting  to bring to their attention information obtained by the e-Lee Dispatch and was not to be an interview. The background for the meeting included relaying the position taken by Kim Strach who was adamant that the ongoing election board's investigation should not in any way impede any law enforcement from pursuing their normal procedures or legal responsibilities. (See previous post) Her position had no yet been published.

This information was thought to be of potential benefit in managing the difficult position for both Kevin Bryant and the department given the prevalent rumors regarding the involvement of the city detective. The meeting was also to reveal, as explained below, that a Sanford council member had initially claimed to have been told directly by Steve Thomas that a Sanford police detective was indeed one of the two "friends" who persuaded him to sign the form. More documentation than is being disclosed here was to be shared so that they could be assured of the reliability of the claim that Thomas had indeed told Stone. This appeared to provide much more creditable information at the same time the city was about to learn it was free to follow its normal procedures during the Board of Elections investigation--information neither the police chief or city manager might have yet had.  The claim of Kevin Brant's involvement would appear to have more credibity than local rumors.

The mayor had been told that there was potentially significant information that should be relayed directly to the city manager and chief pertaining to the election perjury information and was willing, as she put it, "to give it a try." No doubt she had dealt with the independent attitude of Chief Yarborough before and was also aware that the city manager had demonstrated no willingness to take him on.  In most towns and city, a mayor would have been more confident.

Most everyone agrees there ought to be a lot of care in reacting to rumors--even widely and quickly developed ones. That is particularly true when the rumor is potentially (in most towns) devastating to any law enforcement officer's career. Those rumors also had to be evaluated in light of what some expect to be another campaign, and opponents of such a campaign may have reason to start such rumors. Careful reactions would be appropriate for the City of Sanford to consider in reacting to them.

Careful investigation has confirmed from numerous highly responsible sources that City Councilman, and Thomas business partner, Mike Stone had claimed that Steve Thomas had told him directly  the name of at least one, if not both, of the two individuals involved in bringing him the false statement . Those sources all agree that Mike Stone had called the night the first form was filed to tell them that Thomas had given him Kevin Bryant's name as one of the two individuals involved. This was likely creditable information from an elected official related to a possible crime, not a rumor over breakfast.

With Stone now denying making those calls or ever making that claim, it seems unlikely he made this information available to the city manager or chief of police. Saying that Thomas had secured an attorney and told Thomas to stop talking, by mid day the next morning, Stone was no longer making the claim of hearing directly from Thomas. Over time, Stone has offered different descriptions of what happened that night, denies that Thomas told him or that he passed such information along, and claims that his source of information was the same rumors everyone else was hearing.

When asked in a follow-up call why he had declined to have the meeting, Hal Hegwer said "We just aren't interested." In most cities and town refusing such a request from the mayor at all would be unusual and dismissing it with such a comment would bring his future into doubt.  Apparently not in Sanford where it appears to be evidence that the manager understands that when it comes to the police deparment, it is only what Ronnie Yarborough says that matters.  that in such matters the chief of police, not he or the mayor, makes the decisions.

It would seemingly be important that there was now credible evidence that Thomas had claimed that a city detective was involved directly to a city official.  The information concerning Stone's claim  was support by reliable sources as to the their source, not the rumors. One would also believe that a city council member who has taken his own oath to uphold the law would have himself made this information available to the city manager or police chief. But Stone and Thomas are business partners, and Stone may have correctly assumed the information would have no influence on the long time chief who answers to no one and might chose to do whatever was necessary to protect Kevin Bryant.

Stone knows, as do most others, that  hired Kevin Bryant as a detective immediately after the sheriff election in 2006, filling the position without following normal procedures. Many took this as evidence that Yarborough, as rumored, supported Bryant over Tracy Carter. Carter had strongly supported the disbanding of the joint City County Drug Unit, which operated under the Sanford police department but included sheriff's deputies and had jurisdiction over all the county. Ronnie Yarborough strongly disagreed with that position since dissolving the unit  markedly reduced his jurisdiction.

 Perhaps there has already been an internal affairs investigation of the allegation or for some other reason Ronnie Yarborough is satisfied that there is nothing to Thomas's allegation. While the public information laws about such investigations would seemingly not require the disclosure of one of its findings, in most cities, clearing an officer of such a charge would be important to the police department and the officer.

With an unaccountable, arrogant police chief who doesn't care if one of his detectives was involved, an intimidated city manager would just be being practical when he said "We just aren't interested." Even if that is the case, the refusal to honor a request directly from the mayor by a deparment head supported in his refusal by the city manager, shows an attitude of indispensability and the kind of arrogance that should concern every citizen, especially when it is the arrogance of the chief of police.

Editor's  Note:  Sentence Structure Clarified at 6 pm 1/19/2009

Election Investigation Not Going Under The Rug

Outcome Could Mean Felony Charges
 

After an hour's conversation last week with Kim Westbrook Strach, Deputy Director-Campaign Reporting for the State Board of Elections there is no doubt that she considers the deliberate filing of a false financial report a serious election law violation worthy of its status as the only election law violation with that degree of crime.

Election forms say that they are certified to be true and accurate under penalty of perjury, a felony, Strach says that the entire system of finance reporting depends on such forms to be true and honest. That is why the filing of two forms--one by local farmer Stephen Thomas and one by Commissioner Jamie Kelly for the cost of the infamous signs is under serious investigation. One or the other committed a felony. Thomas claimed he signed the form at the request of two friends and has now publicly denied knowing anything about the matter.

The vendor reports that the signs were ordered by Jamie Kelly. This raises the issue of who and why one or more people decided to complete the form and have someone else sign the form. To "suborn" means to bribe or otherwise induce (someone) to commit an unlawful act such as perjury. Those involved in arranging for a false report signed under penalty of perjury can be charged with suborning perjury.

At the end of the investigation, the Board of Elections will turn the results of its investigation to the District Attorney who will determine what charges will be filed. If additional investigation is needed, it will be done by the SBI.

There may be several reasons a large portion of citizens believe that the entire matter will be swept under the rug. Failure to file forms by the Lee County GOP led earlier this year to a suspension of its activities. (click here) Then it was discovered that Commissioner Jamie Kelly had "mistake" by contributing corporate money to the local democratic party by paying for a table at a fund raising dinner. He was given a refund and paid with a personal check. These matters and such offenses as filing a report late almost never even bring the thought of legal action, even though they are in some cases technically misdemeanors.

Many members of the public believe that the perceived political and monetary influence of Jamie Kelly's grandfather, Oscar Keller, in state political circles will cause the entire matter to be swept under the rug. The state board of elections has been generally building a growing reputation for non-partisanship in the consideration of such matters as election law violations and even contested election.

Strach said she had never heard the name Oscar Keller, and his connection to Kelly would not influence anything her office did no matter what influence he tried to apply. She is particularly known for absolute dedication and fairness in her job and for aggressive pursuit of several high-profile cases, mostly against Democrats. The conversation with her left the impression that she is a person who cannot be intimidated in any investigation. Should she observe activity that she thought was actually impeding an investigation, she would ask the district attorney to investigate obstruction of justice.

Strach is aware that Kevin Bryant is a city detective.When informed that the various law enforcement agencies were being careful not to do any thing that might appear to interfere with the election board's investigation, she was adamant that the ongoing election board's investigation should not in any way impede any law enforcement from pursuing their normal procedures or legal responsibilities. "We have our job to do and those agencies have theirs and there is no reason for them not to proceed with doing their job. The ongoing election investigation should not stop them from following their procedures and doing what they are legally responsible for doing."

It is a fair assumption that Jamie Kelly, perhaps Stephen Thomas, will have excellent legal representation to deal with the district attorney's office if that times comes. What has to be of most concern is that Jamie Kelly not be charged and convicted with a crime that results in a felony conviction which would legally preclude his running for office. Yet, just what is  already known and assumed by the public is already a political millstone. If Kelly, in fact however, had nothing to do with obtaining Thomas's signature on the form and was unaware of the plan, the report from the board of elections is something he should welcome.

One thing is for sure is that the matter is not going to end up under a rug.

Refer to these earlier posts for further information:

Smear Campaign On Hincks Begins-Oct 18-19

The Secret's Out

Keller Family Behind Sign Attacks

Form Confirms Facts Reported in Previous Post

Kelly Coverup Clearly Planned

Formal Complaint To Be Filed Today

Complaint Filed With Local Board of Elections

Sanford Herald to Kelly: Step Down or Fess Up

No Step Aside, No Fess Up, No Nothing

Stone in Partnership With Subject of Sign Investigation

What We Think We Know About Signs Could be Wrong

Status of Perjury Complaint to be Reviewed Today

Are Disappearing Jobs "A Job Shift"

Is The Job Becoming Extinct

Editor's Note:The new design of the blog had as one of its major purposes providing information and resources that would help our community understand that we face some difficult challenges. Having read the book in 1995, and been profoundly influenced by it, Job Shift lies at the heart of the work that has gone in the contribution this blog can make where the "good ol' boy system was replaced by a wide community involvement. As we near the completion of our redesign, the headlines seem to confirm our purpose. Things tolerated already too long in our community need to be brought into the light of pubic accountability, and it is hard to think about any part of our community that is not in need of critical examination. Through technology, tremendous information is available on the site that changes every day (Ann Coulter is back!) and posts that appear several times each week relentlessly following up that should not be overlooked will still be informative with their unique edge.

Based on a significant book written in 1995, Job Shift, the Sanford Herald's headline Wednesday, Jobless Rate at Almost 10%, should have come as no surprise. And a review of the paper's archives reveals a steady stream of employee cut backs and plant and business closings In human terms that means in Lee County, 2,684 people reported being unemployed in November out of a 27,430-person workforce.

William Bridges’ Job Shift is a provocative book. Its premise is that one of the single most significant factors in adult life, “the job,” is disappearing, and that our individual and national well-being require a radically different perspective on how to make a living. In other word's, our community's leaders need to recognize the "jobs" aren't coming back--not by an improving economy nor by recruitment of more manufacturing. This means that a lot of issues need to be looked at through a new lens until there is a massive response to a paradigm shift.

His forecast that a number of factors would result in a shrinkage in the number of permanent jobs turned out to have been wrong only by underestimating the speed at which this would happen. Historical insights serve well to put the book’s subject in perspective. For instance, until the industrial revolution a “job” meant nothing more than “a task done for pay.” Job = “full time, 40 hour a week activity” is a meaning that is less than 200 years old. Bridges argues persuasively that the nature of work and the economy over the last few decades is leading us back to a more fluid, less certain situation where there’s just as much work, but where fewer and fewer people will approach the workplace in the tidy box of “a job.”

We tend to operate on the assumption that jobs moving off shore and outsourcing are responsible but that is not it at all. According to Gartner Research, over the past decade, U.S. manufacturing jobs have declined by more than 11 percent,. But at the same time, Japan’s manufacturing employment base has dropped by 16 percent, while the number of manufacturing jobs in countries including Brazil have declined by some 20 percent, And one of the largest losers of manufacturing jobs has been China. At one time 25 percent to 30 percent of the U.S. population was involved in agricultural jobs. But today, only 3 percent of Americans work in agriculture, yet they have turned the United States into a net agricultural exporter. “The same thing is now happening in manufacturing,” Dan Miklovic, vice president and research director at GartnerG2, said. “Through automation, through improved productivity, we’re driving the number of jobs down on a global basis.”

Recent polling seems to indicate that Americans sense this in not just a mid-course correction. Polling data released by Rasmussen Reports™ today reflected that Americans are solidly optimistic about the economy’s recovery, but most expect it to take up to five years to come back. On Tuesday Rasmussen reported that their polling showed that Americans are narrowly divided over whether the United States will still be the world’s most powerful nation at the end of the current century.Thirty-seven percent (37%) of adults believe America will be number one, but 34% disagree, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Twenty-nine percent (29%) are not sure.

A good place to start is the Economic Development Commission. It is much like the record companies. They and the entire music industry built their business model on the distribution of an album and later CD. To get that one song someone loved required them to spend nearly $20 for an entire album featuring other songs no one found all that great. Now the business model was changed by technology and the industry has had no choice but go along. That one song is no longer trapped on an album. Instead it can be purchased separately for about $1 for those who are honest or downloaded for free for those who are not.

The Economic Development Commission's model is one of attracting a "package of static of jobs" with the justification that incentives increase the tax base even if no jobs are created--an increasingly risky bet if the business is home based yet global.

Certainly our government and civic leaders take a 10% unemployment rate seriously, but until the driving forces are re-examined and new paradigms emerge we can be drowned in a wave of change that could have instead been the basis of our own community focused cottage business.

The four videos available through YouTube are mid page to start everyone thinking. They are very similar but each brings some new perspective. A couple have had several million viewers from across the world. They especially raise questions about what should be expected from education. We need leaders to get their heads out of the sand and ruthlessly pursue the new future.

Status of Perjury Complaint To Be Reviewed Today

One Single Piece of Paper May Trigger Local Scandal With Surprises

The complaint filled on late October will be the discussed by a senior official and myself today to access the status of the case. It is unlikely that much will be shared about what the board has found but considerable documentation will be turned over to the state board. Some of these raise issues of jurisdiction since some crimes may have been committed that are normally beyond the scope of election law. All election law violations are handled by the Wake County District attorney with investigations by the SBI.

During the "slower' December period significant time has been spent on the circumstances surrounding this case. Some have always thought it was a minor matter of a form, while others have thought that political influence would cause it to go away. They forget that the entire system of monitoring campaign finance is based on the voluntary and honest compliance of hundreds of campaign treasurers. The system collapses if deliberate falsification is treated lightly.

Based on what is now known, the case may explode into a much larger situation with an amended and highly detailed complaint being filed by a number of individuals. Given the Board of Elections subpoena powers and investigative support by the SBI, what once looked like a simple matter could become a major scandal.

The assumption that Steve Thomas may be offered immunity becomes less likely if the puzzle continues fitting together, and there were other means of confirming who brought the forms to him and may have suborned perjury. People are asked where and when they first heard the rumor and the answers are traced back. In this case they appear to go to almost one single source with whom Thomas shared the information. The famous question "What did you know and when did you know it" may result in significant legal difficulty for some surprised public officials.

When it turns out there is substantial evidence the rumors are true and an elected official supposedly having no other connection with the crime had first hand information identifying some of the perpetrators and takes no action on the matter, has there been obstruction of justice, a failure to honor his oath, or a mere lapse in judgment? Since the possible obstruction of justice grew out of an election law violation, will the legal jurisdiction remain with the Wake District Attorney or will revert to the our own judicial district.

How much can be shared here tomorrow will depend on agreements made and the status of the investigation, but after the meeting those who think this piece of paper is just floating through the air can probably be assured otherwise.